法律汉语教材对比研究—以《中国法律专业汉语教程》和《法律汉语—商事篇》为例

Abstract

法律汉语是专门用途汉语中的一种，法律汉语教材是开展法律汉语教学活动的主要媒介。本文通过对现有常见的两本法律汉语教材进行对比研究，从编写原则、编写体例、教学材料选择、语言文化知识点设计等方面分析两本教材各自的优点和有待完善之处，总结法律汉语教材编写的经验，提出了今后法律汉语教材编写的一些具体可行的改进建议，主要包括：运用CSP理论指导法律汉语教材编写、优化教学材料的选择和编排、丰富文化知识的内容设计和解析等方面。

Legal Chinese is one of the types of Chinese for Specific Purpose (CSP). Legal Chinese Textbooks are the main medium for conducting Legal Chinese teaching activities. This article conducts a comparative study of two commonly used Legal Chinese Textbooks, analyzing their advantages and shortcomings from the perspectives of compilation principles, compilation styles, teaching material selection, and language and cultural knowledge points. It summarizes the experience of Legal Chinese Textbook writing and proposes some specific and feasible improvement suggestions for Legal Chinese Textbook compilation in future, mainly including: using CSP theory to guide the compilation of Legal Chinese Textbooks, optimizing the selection and arrangement of teaching materials, and enriching the content design and analysis of cultural knowledge.