| dc.description.abstract |
This research aimed to examine (1) the living conditions of children and youth, (2) the problems and obstacles in the provision of social welfare services for children and youth, and (3) the development guidelines for social welfare management at the Father Ray Children’s Village, Pattaya City, Chonburi Province. The study employed a qualitative research design. The population consisted of 95 children and youth residing in the Father Ray Children’s Village, together with 19 staff members and caregivers, totaling 114 individuals. The sample group included 10 key informants: administrators, managers, social workers, donors, staff members, and caregivers, 15 youth aged 18 years and over, making a total of 30 participants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.
This research aimed to examine (1) the living conditions of children and youth, (2) the problems and obstacles in the provision of social welfare services for children and youth, and (3) the development guidelines for social welfare management at the Father Ray Children’s Village, Pattaya City, Chonburi Province. The study employed a qualitative research design. The population consisted of 95 children and youth residing in the Father Ray Children’s Village, together with 19 staff members and caregivers, totaling 114 individuals. The sample group included 10 key informants: administrators, managers, social workers, donors, staff members, and caregivers, 15 youth aged 18 years and over, making a total of 30 participants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The findings revealed that (1) regarding the living conditions of children and youth, most children had weight and height within standard criteria, with only a small number experiencing developmental delays or age-inappropriate growth. In terms of psychological well-being, some children experienced mental health problems and required continuous medication and hospital treatment. Socially, younger and older children were generally able to live together happily; however, a few displayed inappropriate behaviors such as violence, fighting, vaping, and game addiction. Intellectually, some children had intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). (2) With respect to the problems and obstacles in the provision of social welfare services for children and youth, the management of basic necessities—food, clothing, medical care, housing facilities, education, healthcare services, and developmental support—was found to meet the standards and objectives of the Father Ray Foundation. Nevertheless, a significant challenge identified was the insufficiency of long-term financial resources to ensure sustainable child care. (3) Regarding the development guidelines for social welfare provision at the Father Ray Children’s Village, the management of social welfare services has evolved from past experiences to the present as follows: (1) in the area of education, efforts have been made to expand educational diversity and accessibility, including increased scholarship funds for higher education and vocational training aligned with each child’s individual potential; (2) in terms of housing, residential facilities have been improved to maximize benefits for both children and caregivers, along with enhancements to the environment and amenities that support daily living and promote quality of life; (3) concerning health, holistic healthcare services covering physical, mental, and social dimensions have been provided, with an emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion, supported by a multidisciplinary team both internally and externally, including referral systems to hospitals and government agencies in complex cases; (4) in the area of recreation, programs have been further developed to foster life skills and social skills through both internal village activities and increased external engagements; (5) regarding employment and income generation, various vocational training programs have been strengthened to instill pride and self-reliance among children, in collaboration with network partners; (6) in terms of general social services, home visit projects and parent engagement initiatives have been implemented to strengthen relationships between parents or guardians and the Father Ray Children’s Village, enabling staff and social workers to closely understand children’s living conditions, problems, and family contexts, thereby facilitating appropriate planning and tailored assistance that responds to the individual needs of each child and youth; and (7) regarding the justice process, assistance for children and youth is carried out in collaboration with the Provincial Office of Social Development and Human Security and other relevant government agencies to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, while upholding human dignity, protecting children’s rights, and prioritizing the best interests of the child as the foremost principle. The findings revealed that (1) regarding the living conditions of children and youth, most children had weight and height within standard criteria, with only a small number experiencing developmental delays or age-inappropriate growth. In terms of psychological well-being, some children experienced mental health problems and required continuous medication and hospital treatment. Socially, younger and older children were generally able to live together happily; however, a few displayed inappropriate behaviors such as violence, fighting, vaping, and game addiction. Intellectually, some children had intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). (2) With respect to the problems and obstacles in the provision of social welfare services for children and youth, the management of basic necessities—food, clothing, medical care, housing facilities, education, healthcare services, and developmental support—was found to meet the standards and objectives of the Father Ray Foundation. Nevertheless, a significant challenge identified was the insufficiency of long-term financial resources to ensure sustainable child care. (3) Regarding the development guidelines for social welfare provision at the Father Ray Children’s Village, the management of social welfare services has evolved from past experiences to the present as follows: (1) in the area of education, efforts have been made to expand educational diversity and accessibility, including increased scholarship funds for higher education and vocational training aligned with each child’s individual potential; (2) in terms of housing, residential facilities have been improved to maximize benefits for both children and caregivers, along with enhancements to the environment and amenities that support daily living and promote quality of life; (3) concerning health, holistic healthcare services covering physical, mental, and social dimensions have been provided, with an emphasis on disease prevention and health promotion, supported by a multidisciplinary team both internally and externally, including referral systems to hospitals and government agencies in complex cases; (4) in the area of recreation, programs have been further developed to foster life skills and social skills through both internal village activities and increased external engagements; (5) regarding employment and income generation, various vocational training programs have been strengthened to instill pride and self-reliance among children, in collaboration with network partners; (6) in terms of general social services, home visit projects and parent engagement initiatives have been implemented to strengthen relationships between parents or guardians and the Father Ray Children’s Village, enabling staff and social workers to closely understand children’s living conditions, problems, and family contexts, thereby facilitating appropriate planning and tailored assistance that responds to the individual needs of each child and youth; and (7) regarding the justice process, assistance for children and youth is carried out in collaboration with the Provincial Office of Social Development and Human Security and other relevant government agencies to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, while upholding human dignity, protecting children’s rights, and prioritizing the best interests of the child as the foremost principle. |
en_US |