Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/2708
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJadsada Kunno-
dc.contributor.authorPataraporn Yubonpunt-
dc.contributor.authorChavanant Sumanasrethakul-
dc.contributor.authorChuthamat Kaewchandee-
dc.contributor.authorMark Gregory Robson-
dc.contributor.authorWachiraporn Wanichnopparat-
dc.contributor.authorKrit Prasittichok-
dc.contributor.authorTitaporn Luangwilai-
dc.contributor.authorChonlawat Chaichan-
dc.contributor.authorPatcharaporn Krainara-
dc.contributor.authorBusaba Supawattanabodee-
dc.contributor.authorเจษฎา คุณโน-
dc.contributor.authorภัทรพร ยุบลพันธ์-
dc.contributor.authorชวนนท์ สุมนะเศรษฐกุล-
dc.contributor.authorจุฑามาศ แก้วจันดี-
dc.contributor.authorวชิราภรณ์ วนิชนพรัตน์-
dc.contributor.authorกฤษณ์ ประสิทธิโชค-
dc.contributor.authorฐิตาภรณ์ เหลืองวิลัย-
dc.contributor.authorชลวัชร ชัยชาญ-
dc.contributor.authorพัชราภรณ์ ไกรนรา-
dc.contributor.authorบุษบา ศุภวัฒน์ธนบดี-
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherHuachiew Chalermprakiet University. Faculty of Public and Environmental Healthen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherRutgers University. School of Environmental and Biological Sciencesen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.contributor.otherNavamindradhiraj University. Faculty of Medicine Vajiraj Hospitalen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-26T09:21:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-26T09:21:28Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationVaccines 2022, 10(8), 1345en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081345-
dc.identifier.urihttps://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/2708-
dc.description.abstractBackground: COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is a global issue. Many people are concerned about experiencing side effects from the vaccine. This study evaluated satisfaction with the COVID-19 vaccine in the general population (GP) and healthcare workers (HCWs) in Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed from September-December 2021. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare GP and HCW participants’ total vaccine satisfaction scores as well as their satisfaction with varying vaccine types. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of satisfaction scores among GP and HCWs. Results: A total of 780 valid questionnaire responses were obtained. The majority of GP participants (n = 390) had received their first (93.3%) and second (88.5%) vaccination shots by viral vector vaccine; however, 90% had not received a third dose (booster). In contrast, the majority of HCW participants (n = 390) had received their first (92.8%) and second (82.8%) vaccination doses by the inactivated vaccine, and 83% had received a third vaccine dose. HCWs had significantly higher total satisfaction scores than GP participants (p = 0.034), and they were also significantly more satisfied with the mRNA vaccine as a third dose (p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression models found less association with vaccine satisfaction among GP participants who had not isolated following exposure to COVID-19 and those who have never been at risk of infection (β −0.159; 95% CI −12.867, −1.877; p = 0.009). Among HCWs, being married (β 0.157; 95% CI 0.794, 3.278; p = 0.001) or divorced (β 0.198; 95% CI 3.303, 9.596; p < 0.01) was more closely associated with vaccine satisfaction than being single. Conclusion: HCWs were more satisfied with the type and efficacy of inactivated, viral vector, and mRNA vaccines than GP participants, and the former were also more satisfied with the cost of vaccine boosters. Our results indicate that satisfaction with the COVID-19 vaccine is based on academic knowledge sharing and the government’s promotion efforts. Future research will explore strategies to raise awareness about the importance of vaccination.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectCOVID-19 vaccinesen
dc.subjectวัคซีนโควิด-19en
dc.subjectVaccinationen
dc.subjectการให้วัคซีนen
dc.subjectCOVID-19 (Disease)en
dc.subjectโควิด-19 (โรค)en
dc.subjectSatisfactionen
dc.subjectความพอใจen
dc.subjectPublic health personnelen
dc.subjectบุคลากรสาธารณสุขen
dc.subjectMedical personnelen
dc.subjectบุคลากรทางการแพทย์en
dc.subjectCOVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-en
dc.subjectการระบาดใหญ่ของโควิด-19, ค.ศ. 2020-en
dc.titleSatisfaction with COVID-19 Vaccines in Health Care Workers and the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study in Urban Bangkok, Thailanden
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Public and Environmental Health - Artical Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Satisfaction-with-COVID19-Vaccines.pdf583.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.