Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/3901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNopporn Kurustien-
dc.contributor.authorKeerin Mekhora-
dc.contributor.authorWattana Jalayondeja-
dc.contributor.authorSuebsak Nanthavanij-
dc.contributor.authorนพพร คุรุเสถียร-
dc.contributor.authorคีรินท์ เมฆโหรา-
dc.contributor.authorวรรธนะ ชลายนเดชะ-
dc.contributor.authorสืบศักดิ์ นันทวานิช-
dc.contributor.otherHuachiew Chalermprakiet University. Faculty of Physical Therapyen
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapyen
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Physical Therapyen
dc.contributor.otherThammasat University. Sirindhorn International Institute of Technologyen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-24T09:09:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-24T09:09:50Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand 97, Suppl.7 (June 2014) S75-S79en
dc.identifier.urihttps://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/3901-
dc.descriptionสามารถเข้าถึงบทความฉบับเต็ม (Full Text) ได้ที่ : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25141532/en
dc.description.abstractObjective: The present study evaluated the changes in trunk-stabilizer electromyography (EMG) activities during manual lifting with and without a back belt in experienced back belt users. Material and method: Eighteen participants from a warehouse and distribution center in Thailand, aged 22 to 44 years, were assessed for trunk stabilizer muscle EMG activity including the rectus abdominis (RA), external abdominal oblique (EO), transversus abdominis (TrA), internal abdominal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF). The EMG data were recorded during (1) rest and (2) the initial phase of manual lifting in a dynamic semi-squat posture. For both conditions, the data were compared with and without wearing a back belt. Results: The results showed that wearing a back belt significantly decreased TrA/IO activity during rest (p<0.01) and significantly increased RA activity during the lifting period (p<0.05) as compared with the condition of no back belt. Conclusion: The present study does not recommend healthy workers wear a back belt as a protective device for lower back injury, particularly without any lifting activity. However the back belt can be applied during lifting as it can enhance RA activity, which may help improve abdominal pressure and is less likely cause weakness of the TrA.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectกำลังกล้ามเนื้อen
dc.subjectMuscle strengthen
dc.subjectเข็มขัดพยุงหลังen
dc.subjectBack belten
dc.subjectการฝึกกำลังกล้ามเนื้อen
dc.subjectMuscle strength trainingen
dc.subjectการยกและเคลื่อนย้ายen
dc.subjectLifting and carryingen
dc.subjectการบันทึกคลื่นไฟฟ้ากล้ามเนื้อen
dc.subjectElectromyographyen
dc.subjectเออร์โกโนมิกส์en
dc.subjectErgonomicsen
dc.subjectแกนกลางลำตัวen
dc.subjectCore musclesen
dc.titleTrunk stabilizer muscle activity during manual lifting with and without back belt use in experienced workersen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Physical Therapy - Articles Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Trunk-stabilizer-muscle-activity-during-manual-lifting.pdf61.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.