Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/4722
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdhika Pramita Widyassari-
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Rante Carreon-
dc.contributor.authorRetno Wahyusari-
dc.contributor.otherInformatics, Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Roggolawe, Indonesiaen
dc.contributor.otherHuachiew Chalermprakiet University. Faculty of Medical Technologyen
dc.contributor.otherInformatics, Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Roggolawe, Indonesiaen
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-27T14:06:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-27T14:06:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJurnal Teknik Informatika (JUTIF) 5,6 (December 2024) : 1737-1746.en
dc.identifier.issn2723-3863 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn2723-3871 (Online)-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2024.5.6.4089-
dc.identifier.urihttps://has.hcu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/4722-
dc.descriptionสามารถเข้าถึงบทความฉบับเต็ม (Full Text) ได้ที่ : https://jutif.if.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/juranl/article/view/4089/690en
dc.description.abstractThere is an urgent need to detect and manage mental health disorders among college students, who often face psychological challenges due to academic pressures and significant life changes. In this context, expert systems emerge as a potential tool to assist in the diagnosis and management of mental health problems. The purpose of this study is to present the results of a systematic review of expert systems for detecting mental health disorders in college students through the systematic literature review (SLR) method. By asking four research questions covering types of mental health disorders, methods used, comparisons between methods, and testing techniques, this study limits its review to studies published in the last five years, from 2019 to 2024. This review covers various types of mental health disorders, such as depression, anxiety, stress disorders and other mental health disorders that are often experienced by the college student population. As well as evaluating and comparing methods such as forward chaining, backward chaining, certainty factor and fuzzy logic methods to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Certainty Factor emerged as the most accurate method with an accuracy of 96.09% and the recommendation for combining methods for this study is certainty factor and forward chaining with an accuracy result of 100%. In addition, this study also discusses the testing process to ensure the effectiveness and accuracy of the resulting diagnosis. The findings of this systematic review are expected to provide valuable insights for the development of more effective expert systems in supporting college students' mental health.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectSystematic reviews (Medical research)en
dc.subjectการทบทวนอย่างเป็นระบบ (วิจัยทางการแพทย์)en
dc.subjectMental health disordersen
dc.subjectความผิดปกติทางจิตen
dc.subjectExpert systemsen
dc.subjectระบบผู้เชี่ยวชาญen
dc.subjectCollege studentsen
dc.subjectนักศึกษาen
dc.titleSystematic Review of Expert System for Detecting Mental Health Disorders in College Studentsen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Medical Technology - Articles Journals



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.